Falconer Attack Update: Major Holes Appear in Vic Hull�s Story
Source: WFPDate: Mon Mar 30 05:29:30 MST 2026
(Wingham, North Huron, ON) � As the investigation into the Feb. 17 incident involving North Huron Deputy Reeve Kevin Falconer continues, serious questions are emerging about the reliability of statements made by witness Vic Hull.
Vic Hull�s version of events, published in a recent newspaper article, contains multiple contradictions, assumptions, and claims about events he was not in a position to observe.
Vic Hull Was Not Present At The Beginning
By Vic Hull�s own account, he was sitting in his truck and only looked up after the situation was already unfolding. This means Vic did not witness the beginning of the incident and cannot provide a direct account of what actually triggered the confrontation.
Yet portions of his statement read as if he had observed the entire sequence of events.
That alone raises serious concerns about how much of Hull�s account is direct observation versus speculation or second-hand information.
Claims About Blood Contradicted
Vic Hull claims Falconer�s face was �completely bloody�the second time was way worse.�
However, video and witness accounts indicate there was no visible blood after Falconer�s first fall. Hull was not present at that time.
If Hull arrived after Falconer was already on the ground the second time, then he could not have observed what Falconer looked like earlier in the incident.
This raises the question: how could Hull claim knowledge of events he did not witness?
The �Kick Him Again� Claim
Hull claims someone yelled �kick him again.�
Witnesses say no such statement was made.
If that phrase was never spoken, Hull�s statement falsely attributes violent intent to the crowd and dramatically alters how the public perceives the event.
Repeating Hearsay As Fact
Vic Hull also repeats Falconer�s claim that he had been kicked in the head.
Even if Falconer said that, Hull did not witness it.
That makes the statement hearsay, not evidence.
Adding further confusion, there was no mention that night of steel-toed boots or shoes, a detail that appeared later in Hull�s narrative.
Claims Vic Hull Could Not Possibly Know
Vic Hull also states that Stephen �Buck� Hill �has the video.�
But Vic Hull arrived after the incident was already underway and was not in a position to know whether Hill had been recording earlier, when any recording began, or what footage exists.
In other words, that claim is speculation presented as fact.
Location Confusion
Hull also places himself in the parking lot of the Wescast Community Complex, while the council meeting itself occurred on Frances Street.
That discrepancy raises additional questions about Hull�s understanding of where events were actually happening.
Emotional Language Instead of Observation
Vic Hull described people around Falconer as acting �like animals.�
That language is not neutral observation. It reflects an emotional interpretation of events rather than careful reporting of what was actually seen.
Witness credibility depends on clear, factual observations � not inflammatory descriptions.
Free Speech Misunderstood
Vic Hull also complained that he had been blocked from posting comments on the Buck & Jo�s Facebook page.
But freedom of speech does not mean anyone has the right to post whatever they want on someone else�s private platform.
Free speech protects the public�s ability to hold people in authority accountable � particularly elected officials and those exercising government power.
It does not give someone the right to post abuse or harassment on a privately run Facebook page.
Investigation Ongoing
The Falconer incident has since evolved into a serious matter involving allegations of assault, broken ribs, and potential Charter violations. Ontario�s Special Investigations Unit (SIU) is now reviewing the events surrounding that evening.
In a situation this serious, facts matter.
Witness statements that rely on speculation, assumptions, or hearsay can distort the public understanding of what actually happened.
At minimum, the contradictions in Vic Hull�s account make it difficult to treat his narrative as a reliable eyewitness description of the incident.
The truth of what happened will ultimately depend on video evidence, credible witness testimony, and the findings of investigators � not speculation or headlines.
Area OPP
North Huron Drug Bust: Schiestel, Bartlett, Salsbury, Southgate-Nicholls, Bryant & BressetteHand of God Stops Deputy Reeve � Wingham Church Attendance Explodes Overnight � God Protects The Square Mile #GPTSM
Michael Weber Was Arrested
Jason BENDER & Michael DOVE � Drunk Driving
KERR Arrested For Drunk Driving
SIU Attempts Coverup After OPP Beat Senior Breaking Ribs In Clinton Detachment #OPPDeclareWar #ItsNotOver #FTP
John DURWARD � Drunk Driving
Raquel ORMENO Was Arrested Again #3Strikes
Travis MACDONALD � Drunk Driving
Patrick ALBISTON Arrested For Alledgedly Failing To Stop For Police #DisbandHuronOPP
Wire Recovered � CHAPMAN, MCDERMOTT, ABDULKADIR & TENTO
School Bus Collision Sends 3 to Hospital
Repeat Offender Arrested In Exeter � Nickolas ELLIOTT #3Strikes
Joseph SCHRAM � Drunk Driving
Central Huron $2,000,000 �Drug� Bust
Meth Bust In Teeswater � Ronald WARD Arrested
56 Year Old From Mildmay Arrested � Details Released
OPP Warn Of Widespread Crown Attorney Frauds
Amanda COTE Arrested After Incident In Mount Forest
Wingham Meth Bust � Repeat Offender Arrested Again � OPP Slow To Inform Public
22 Year Old From Morris-Turnberry Arrested � Details Released
North Huron Repeat Offender Arrested & Released A Month Ago � Huron OPP Detachment Under Scrutiny
Shawn JENKINSON � Drunk Driving
Three Suspects & $7,500 Gone � OPP Delay Raises Questions
Huron OPP Seeking Witnesses 40 Days After The Fact